Concept Brief: A Publicly Traded, Regionally Owned Stadium Model for the Tampa Bay Rays

I. Introduction

How do you get a single municipality to finance a regional asset? You don’t.

Major League Baseball franchises often seek public participation in facility financing, yet public subsidies have consistently sparked debate over their long-term fiscal value. In Tampa Bay, the Rays’ pursuit of a new stadium on public land has centered on a financing package heavily reliant on tourist taxes and the Community Investment Tax (CIT). Multiple Hillsborough County commissioners have questioned using CIT dollars—originally intended for infrastructure, public safety, and education—for a professional sports stadium. Some assert that “this agreement does not happen without CIT funding,” even as others claim voters did not contemplate stadium use when renewing the tax. [wtsp.com], [yahoo.com]

At the same time, delays, unresolved cost estimates (with potential escalations related to roof design), and questions about public benefit have intensified scrutiny over reliance on traditional stadium subsidies and the recently proposed funding framework from the Tampa Bay Rays. [wtsp.com]

This concept paper proposes an alternate financing strategy: the creation of a publicly traded stadium ownership entity, with 51% retained by Rays ownership and 49% offered to regional residents and businesses. This model aims to:

  • Reduce or eliminate reliance on CIT and other general-purpose taxes
  • Provide economic opportunity through ownership for fans and regional stakeholders
  • Strengthen transparency and long-term fiscal sustainability
  • Support infrastructure investment that provides broad public benefit

Drawing from successful examples like The Battery Atlanta, where the Atlanta Braves integrated team ownership with mixed-use development through a publicly traded corporate structure, this model offers Tampa Bay an innovative, inclusive, and financially responsible path forward. [fullsportsnet.com]

II. Lessons from The Battery Atlanta and Public Ownership Models

1. The Battery Atlanta as a Revenue Diversified Sports District

The Atlanta Braves’ model integrates baseball operations with real estate revenues in The Battery Atlanta, a $1.1 billion mixed use district generating significant foot traffic—over 9 million annual visitors, exceeding three times the average game attendance. [fullsportsnet.com]

By building out offices, retail, hotel, and entertainment assets adjacent to Truist Park, the Braves created a robust revenue ecosystem not counted as baseball revenue, enabling reinvestment and competitive growth. The Battery ultimately became a net positive for Cobb County taxpayers, generating more property tax revenue than the county’s debt service obligations. In 2022, The Battery remitted $2.5 million in property taxes and channeled $38 million in tax revenue to regional public entities, with property values rising from $5 million to $736 million since development began. [atlanta.urbanize.city]

2. Publicly Traded Sports Ownership: Atlanta Braves Holdings

Atlanta Braves Holdings is a publicly traded entity (BATRA, BATRK), enabling fans and investors to buy shares, strengthening public transparency and engagement. The annual financial report along with the Earnings Webcast shows how business and operations is broken down as well as the stadium, team franchise, and mixed-use development. The company balances revenues between baseball operations and mixed-use development, reporting $663 million in total revenue in 2024, including $67 million from mixed use development. [bravesholdings.com]

This model, blending team operations, venue assets and community integrated development, demonstrates how publicly traded ownership creates investor alignment, enhances governance transparency, and diversifies income, reducing pressure for public subsidies.

3. Limitations of Traditional Public Subsidies

Economic research broadly shows that publicly funded stadiums rarely generate the economic growth claimed. Studies conclude that benefits to residents often fall short of public expenditure. [journalistsresource.org]

When public funding is used, it is generally most effective when tied to infrastructure, multi-use districts, or public facing assets, not exclusively to the stadium itself. This underpins the argument for shifting Tampa’s public participation away from direct stadium subsidies and toward infrastructure improvements with demonstrated community benefit.

III. Proposed Financing Model: A Publicly Traded Regional Stadium Entity (TBRSE)

This proposal establishes a Tampa Bay Regional Stadium Entity (TBRSE), a publicly traded corporation owning the stadium facility and associated revenue streams (excluding team operations).

1. Proposed Equity Structure for the Stadium including an Initial Public Offering (IPO) and Private Investment in Public Equity (PIPE).

  • 51% Ownership: Tampa Bay Rays ownership group (retaining operational control)
  • 25% Ownership: Residents of the Tampa Bay metro’s eight Counties,
  • 10% Ownership: Local small businesses and nonprofit institutions (e.g., chambers of commerce, community foundations)
  • 10% Ownership: Regional institutional investors (pension funds, credit unions)
  • 4% Ownership: Open public market

This structure mirrors the local accessibility ethos seen in Atlanta Braves Holdings while ensuring stability through majority team ownership. [fullsportsnet.com]

2. Shareholder Benefits

  • Annual dividends derived from stadium revenues (naming rights, non-baseball events, parking, leases)
  • Region based early investment ensures local wealth retention
  • Flexible liquidity through public-market tradability
  • Community pride and direct economic participation

3. Revenue Streams Feeding RTBSE

  • Naming Rights & Corporate Partnerships: These can generate significant annual revenue, often tens of millions per year in major markets.
  • Non-MLB Events: Concerts, festivals, collegiate sports, and conventions increase venue utilization and diversify revenue sources.
  • Parking Operations & District Fees: A structured parking system with demand-based pricing can create reliable revenue.

4.  Team Lease Payments & Ticket Surcharges

A modest surcharge (e.g., $1–$2 per ticket) can support maintenance and capital repair reserves, an idea already floated as a potential alternative funding tool in local debate. [wtsp.com]

5.  Long Term Real Estate Appreciation

As demonstrated in The Battery’s appreciation from $5 million to $736 million in under a decade, real estate value capture is a powerful financial driver. [atlanta.urbanize.city]

IV. A Regional Infrastructure Only Approach

Public funds should be directed exclusively to infrastructure that benefits the community, not toward the stadium structure itself. This approach respects public concerns that CIT was not intended for sports facilities, reduces public tax liability, and ensures that it focuses public investment on needed infrastructure. [floridapolitics.com], [wtsp.com]

1. Permitted Infrastructure Uses for Public Funds

  • Roadway improvements supporting multimodal mobility
  • Transit enhancements
  • Pedestrian and bike connectivity
  • Stormwater upgrades (potential match for CDBG DR funds)
  • Public utility upgrades

These uses improve overall quality of life by supporting neighborhood services, support economic development beyond the stadium, and align with the principles of public benefit.

2. City-County Cost Sharing

Because the stadium will serve as a regional asset:

  • Tampa and Hillsborough may agree to proportionate infrastructure contributions.
  • Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) districts may capture incremental value from mixed use development surrounding the facility, consistent with approaches already considered for Rays-related development.
  • Tourist Development Taxes can be applied narrowly to visitor serving infrastructure, avoiding burdens on general taxpayers.

V. Tax Abatement Strategy

To enhance financial viability, TBRSE would receive:

  • Property tax abatement for the stadium for the duration of the lease
  • Full taxation on all private mixed-use development

This contrasts with previous concerns about 99-year leases offering full property tax exemption, which were criticized in traditional subsidy proposals. [fieldofschemes.com]

Under the new model:

  • The stadium is treated as a public benefit venue, justifying abatement
  • Mixed use assets remain fully taxable, benefiting the city, county and school district.

VI. Maintenance, Capital Renewal, and Financial Sustainability

Stadiums typically have a 30-year useful life, requiring clear long term renewal planning. [nuveen.com]

  • Capital Reserve Funds: Annual contributions from stadium revenue will fund a Capital Repair & Renewal Trust, avoiding sudden public or private outlays.
  • Responsibility for Overruns: In true partnership, the TBRSE would be responsible for construction cost overruns as an initial  contingency as well as operational maintenance of the playing facility.

This shields the public from risks documented in failed public financing deals elsewhere.

VII. Transparency and Public Engagement

In response to local calls for transparency, a publicly traded structure ensures:

  • Public reporting of financials
  • Regulated disclosures
  • Open board governance
  • Shareholder voting mechanisms

IX. Implementation of TBRSE

1. Phase 1: Feasibility and Structuring

  • Establish TBRSE legal structure
  • Conduct valuation of stadium revenue streams
  • Define offering prospectus for resident-share distributions

2. Phase 2: Initial Public Offering (IPO) and Private Investment in Public Equity (PIPE)

  • Reserve a tranche exclusively for regional residents, small businesses and institutions
  • Open remainder to public markets

X. The Win-Win-Win

The Tampa Bay region has an opportunity to pioneer a bold, equitable, and financially responsible stadium financing strategy that honors voter intent, protects public priorities, and creates a shared regional asset. By establishing a publicly traded stadium facility, mirroring the Braves’ innovative and successful approach at The Battery Atlanta, the region can reduce dependence on contentious public subsidies, foster local ownership, empower residents economically, and ensure that the stadium supports, not strains, the community.

Rays ownership will benefit from substantial, recurring revenue not tied to baseball performance through mixed-use development adjacent to the stadium. The Rays get local, loyal, invested partners who have a financial interest in the team’s, the stadium’s and the district’s success.

Economic & Social Benefits

  • Local/regional investors share directly in gains from the stadium.
  • Region-based investment retains wealth locally.
  • Increased taxable value from stadium adjacent development strengthens municipal revenues
  • Infrastructure improvements provide long-term community benefit.
  • Reduced public tax exposure.
  • Provide local communities with tangible ownership stakes, correcting historical patterns where public funds subsidized private profit with little return.

This model embraces transparency, distributes risk fairly, and connects the stadium’s success to the prosperity of the community it serves. With thoughtful implementation and regional cooperation, Tampa Bay can create the nation’s first publicly traded, locally owned major-league stadium, setting a new standard for sports infrastructure financing in the United States.

Help us push for smarter solutions like this.

We’re building a campaign focused on real ideas, real accountability, and putting Tampa residents first.
Every contribution helps us reach more voters and move this conversation forward.